The Building Of The American Empire!

General Wesley Clark

Are the Americans and Western Allies justified in starting a new war in the Middle East?  And if so, what is their justification? Who (if anyone) stands to gain and who stands to lose in such a conflict? Have they really said or given us a reason- a (REAL) reason, as to why they are contemplating another war in a region so volatile it can drag the entire world into the Biblical apocalypse we have been avoiding since the invention of nuclear weapons? The obvious and only answer is NO; an absolute and unequivocal NO.

The Americans, the French, the Germans, and the Brits will have you believe their intentions are honorable and their actions will be based strictly on “preventing the mass killings of Syrians with chemical weapons” the operative word being CHEMICAL- currently in the possession of Bashar al – Assad. While you are listening to spin doctors like John McCain and company or “All the president’s men” or the media commentators/military experts…blah blah…blah, think about that phrase… “Preventing the mass killings of Syrians with chemical weapons”.  Take a deep breath hit the emotional breaks, step on the rational accelerator and consider the following.  These are the individuals whose careers- political or military, their wealth-  individual or corporate, depend on the instability of entire countries or entire regions; Then ask yourself the following questions:  Why are we really getting involved in Syria and who will benefit from the results of this conflict.  Think about it because as global citizens you are all being manipulated into becoming cheerleaders for war mongers, corporate thieves, political perverts, religious fanatics, blinded ideologues and those social activists, who, though their hearts are in the right place their brains are grazing in a "field of tall grass”.

The Allied reasoning for military intervention in Syria is so obviously stupid and irrational that a five year old would have issues with it.  So far at least 100,000 people have been killed and over 1.5 million have become refugees living in neighbouring countries under hellish conditions.

Think about it!  100,000 dead 1.5 million in refugee camps and none of the Western Allies thought it necessary or urgent enough to intervene.  Why?  Because the method of their extermination was [up until now] been accomplished with conventional weaponry like missiles, tonnage bombs, machineguns, tanks, gunship helicopters and any other conventional death delivery systems you can think of.  In other words no military intervention by the Western Allies seems to be necessary as long as carnage and the slaughter of civilians is delivered by standard weaponry and not WMDs. Does it make sense to you? Because it doesn’t make any fucking sense to me. So like you, I am forced to deduce that there has to be an ulterior motive for the sudden military response by the Allies.  I couldn’t think of one and then I came across this little video clip…. Which I think provides some answers.  Click or paste the link below, take a "wake-up" pill, and wash it down with a glass of good old “soul searching”.  Enjoy your EPIPHANY!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw

This Again Is Not News…It’s Western Imperialism!

 Signing Off…Dr. Politikong